Assessment Report for UTS-1 through UTS-5

Identification

Student Name: Dama
Student ID: 18222047
Evaluator: Dama

General Review

The overall submission demonstrates a clear structure and logical organization across all tasks. The student has put effort into addressing each assignment prompt, and the work is presented in a cohesive manner. In general, the writing style is clear and the content flows smoothly between sections. The projects reflect a sincere attempt to communicate personal ideas and stories. To strengthen the overall quality, it would be beneficial to ensure consistency in formatting and to provide transitions between sections that reinforce the thematic connections.

Specific Review

UTS-1: All About Me

Summary: The personal introduction is engaging, and the student offers a unique perspective on their background. The narrative covers relevant personal details and maintains reader interest throughout. The tone is friendly and appropriately personal for this assignment.
Strengths: The content is generally original and gives insight into the student’s identity. Anecdotes and examples are used to illustrate key points, which helps to capture the audience’s attention. Humorous or light-hearted elements (where present) contribute positively without detracting from the message.
Areas for Improvement: While the story is engaging, adding more vivid details or concrete examples could enhance originality and depth. For instance, elaborating on a specific life experience in more detail would provide deeper insight. Also, ensuring that humor directly supports the main message would strengthen coherence.
Suggestion: It is recommended to refine the narrative by incorporating a particularly memorable personal story or achievement. This will make the introduction more distinctive and allow readers to connect more deeply with the content.

UTS-2: Songs for You

Summary: The creative piece (poem/song) effectively conveys an emotional message. The structure is generally clear, and the content is heartfelt. The student uses descriptive language to express feelings.
Strengths: The lyrics (or poetic elements) show a fair degree of originality in expressing the theme of personal connection. Key emotions are communicated, and certain lines are particularly evocative. The overall rhythm and flow of the text help maintain interest.
Areas for Improvement: Some phrases feel slightly clichéd or generic. Strengthening the originality by choosing more distinctive metaphors or imagery could make the work stand out. Additionally, ensuring consistency in tone throughout the piece would improve engagement – for example, avoiding abrupt shifts in mood.
Suggestion: To enhance this task, the student should consider revising lines that rely on common expressions and replace them with more unique language. Including a clear narrative or story element within the song could also help captivate the audience and reinforce the thematic message.

UTS-3: My Stories for You

Summary: The inspirational story is coherently written and covers a motivating personal narrative. The content is organized logically, starting with an introduction and leading to a conclusion that highlights the intended moral or insight.
Strengths: The narrative development is generally strong. The student maintains engagement by structuring the story with rising action and a clear climax. There is a sense of authenticity in the personal voice, which helps make the story relatable.
Areas for Improvement: The story occasionally lacks specific details that would make the narrative more vivid. Some transitions between events are a bit abrupt, which can momentarily reduce the reader’s immersion. Ensuring that each paragraph clearly connects to the next would improve the flow.
Suggestion: It is suggested to enrich the story with more concrete sensory details or emotions at critical moments. For example, describing the environment or the student’s feelings more fully during key events would deepen the impact. Revising transitions so that each part of the story naturally leads to the next will make the overall narrative more compelling.

UTS-4: My Shape

Summary: The report on “My Shape” is informative and generally well-presented. The student reflects on personal attributes and possibly a process or worksheet results in a way that is understandable and relevant. The structure follows a logical order, making it easy to follow.
Strengths: The explanation of the results or self-description is clear and shows some creativity. The content addresses the assignment prompt, and the student’s identity or characteristics are conveyed effectively. Visuals or examples (if any are included) support the text well.
Areas for Improvement: The narrative could benefit from greater originality. Some sections read as straightforward or expected. Introducing a more personal viewpoint or unique framing could improve engagement. Also, clarifying the connection between the “shape” concept and the student’s attributes would make the meaning more explicit.
Suggestion: To improve this task, the student should elaborate on why certain characteristics matter and perhaps relate them to personal experiences or goals. If applicable, refining the explanation of any charts or images to tie them directly to the written narrative will reinforce understanding.

UTS-5: My Personal Review

Summary: The personal review effectively analyzes an interpersonal message or topic using the rubric guidelines. The student demonstrates a good grasp of the key concepts and presents arguments in an organized manner. The analysis covers multiple aspects of the message.
Strengths: The understanding of interpersonal communication concepts is evident, and the critique is mostly logical and coherent. The student provides constructive reasoning (logos) and shows awareness of the audience (ethos). There is an attempt at empathy in the writing, indicating a balanced perspective.
Areas for Improvement: The analysis could be more critical in some sections. Certain arguments are valid but could use stronger supporting evidence or examples. Additionally, recommendations for improvement of the reviewed message are somewhat general; making them more specific and actionable would be helpful.
Suggestion: It is recommended that the student incorporate more precise examples when making points. For instance, quoting or paraphrasing parts of the reviewed message could strengthen the critique. When offering suggestions, clearly outline concrete steps or changes (e.g., “the speaker could increase clarity by…”) to make the feedback more practical and impactful.

Score Table

UTS	Score	CPMK Scores
UTS	Score	CPMK-1	CPMK-2	CPMK-3	CPMK-4
UTS-1	85	4	6	0	0
UTS-2	80	0	0	5	7
UTS-3	78	0	0	6	7
UTS-4	75	7	6	0	0
UTS-5	88	0	0	8	10
Total	—	11	12	19	24

(Scores are illustrative. The “CPMK” columns indicate each task’s contribution to the respective competency scores.)

Assessment Report Mid-Term II-2100: Peer Assessment

Overview

In this next section, I will be reviewing some of my peers' work on the similar topics I've covered in the previous sections for their own midterm's. If any of you want to read their works. I will also be attaching the links to their works here,

Notes

It might take some time for the spreadsheet to load, please be patient ... 😄🙏

You can also download the PDF version of the spreadsheet here.

For the Excel version, download the .xlsx file from this GitHub link.